Peer Review of Teaching

peers

Peer review is an important component of the evaluation of teaching. Peer review can include, but is not limited to, review of curriculum, teaching materials, student artifacts, teaching portfolios, and classroom observations. While peer review is often initially solely associated with personnel decisions, the practice also holds value for the improvement of teaching through revisions that arise from feedback from colleagues. Instructors can provide feedback on aspects of their colleagues' teaching that extend beyond typical learner knowledge. Due to their experience in the field, instructors can provide perspectives that improve teaching through the provision of quality feedback designed to align instructional practices with disciplinary and departmental goals.

Peer review processes are multifaceted, must be thoughtfully constructed, and include several considerations. However, when done well, research indicates several benefits of peer review, including, but not limited to: 

  • It provides another perspective on teaching effectiveness beyond student opinion of teaching surveys. Unlike learners, peer reviewers are often experts in the faculty member’s discipline and/or pedagogy (Berk et al., 2004). 
  • It helps faculty better recognize areas of teaching strengths and weakness and determine how to improve (Al Qahatani et al, 2011). 
  • Faculty report that participating in peer review is useful and helps them improve their teaching (Bell & Mladenovic, 2008; DiVall et al. 2012) and that the benefits outweigh the effort of participating (DiVall et al., 2012).
  • Peer observations benefit the observer as well as the faculty member being observed (Bell & Mladenovic, 2008; Hendry & Oliver, 2012; Swinglehurst et al., 2008). 
  • Observers have reported that observations help them learn about new teaching strategies and increase their confidence in their abilities to perform new teaching strategies themselves in class (Hendry & Oliver, 2012). 
Consider this excellent Guide on Peer Review of Teaching by Joe Bandy at Vanderbilt University for more details on benefits, challenges and processes for peer reviews. 
If you are interested in a peer review of your teaching, you may reach out to the Center for Faculty Development and Excellence or the Office of Evidence Based Learning

 

References 

Al Qahtani, S., Kattan, T., Al Harbi, K., Seefeldt, M. (2011).Some thoughts on educational peer evaluation (opens in new tab).South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 5(1), 47–49. 

Bell, A. & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55(6). doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1 (opens in new tab) 

Berk, R.A., Naumann, P.L., & Appling, S.A. (2004). Beyond student ratings: Peer observation of classroom and clinical teaching. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 1(1).doi: 10.2202/1548-923x.1024 (opens in new tab) 

DiVall, M., Barr, J., Gonyeau, M., Matthews, S. J., Van Amburgh, J., Qualters, D., & Trujillo, J. (2012). Follow-up assessment of a faculty peer observation and evaluation program. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(4). doi: 10.5688/ajpe76461 (opens in new tab) 

Hendry, G.D. & Oliver, G.R. (2012). Seeing is believing: The benefits of peer observation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(1). (PDF – 114KB)  

Swinglehurst, D., Russell, J. & Greenhalgh, R. (2008).Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: an action research approach (opens in new tab).Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 383-393. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00274.x